Search results

The purpose of this paper is to inform readers and researchers about the use of a “lived experience” of therapeutic community work as an effective intervention for severely emotionally troubled children.

An explanation of the main developmental influences and how the Mulberry Bush School is continuing to incorporate new theories and approaches.

How the Mulberry Bush as a specialist therapeutic residential provision can bring about excellent outcomes for severely emotionally troubled children.

The paper explores the work and legacy of the school's founder Barbara Dockar-Drysdale and of her collaboration with Donald Winnicott to create a lived experience of community as an agent of therapeutic change. The paper also provides descriptions and a case study of the current multi-disciplinary work of the school, including how neuroscientific research is influencing the evolution of the therapeutic task with traumatised children.

The paper shows how a highly evolved model of integrated provision can support excellent outcomes for traumatised children and young people.

To broaden and deepen knowledge about the use of therapeutic community principles in the treatment of severely emotionally trouble children and young people.

Diamond‐Star Motors is committed to producing world‐class quality automobiles. To achieve this, a new assembly plant integrates the best existing technology from its parents — Chrysler Motors and Mitsubishi Motors — and employs the latest in manufacturing methods and machinery. All workers are responsible for their own work, as well as checking work previously completed. The Japanese philosophy of Kaizen, the continuous improvement through quality circles and individual suggestions, is practised throughout the company.

There is a central theme to this collection of essays and reflections, which is that we are in a period of profound and significant change. And whilst some elements of this period of change derive from the instability of the financial and banking sectors, there is a more important set of changes taking place. We think that these changes open the possibility of imagining an alternative to the market-based relationships of the past 30 years. We have characterised these relationships as ones which reflect the dominant ideology of neo-liberalism and that within advanced capitalist economies these relationships have determined social, welfare and public policy decisions. And a key part of this has been the dominance of a different discourse on the nature of civil society, the relationship between the individual, the market and the state, and that, as a consequence, the role of public agencies and institutions as a crude welfare safety net has been undermined over time. The crash of 2008, we suggest, had a profoundly destabilising impact on this social/political settlement. It appears to have accelerated the rush towards market-led solutions and the retreat of the ‘public’ from within public conversation.

Purpose – The primary purpose of this chapter is to explore the potential implications of the 2008 banking crisis for university business and management schools and to reflect upon the organizational and pedagogic possibilities highlighted by the changes discussed.

Design/Approach – The chapter draws upon an extensive literature review.

Findings – The chapter argues that the crisis has long-term, profound implications for practitioners, policymakers, and political elites as well as those working in higher education business and management education. The authors suggest that these changes have yet to be clearly understood or appreciated across the sector and that they represent a severe test for elites working in universities.

Research implications – The chapter describes a possible organizational model for business schools and explores a different paradigm for public management education in universities.

Originality – The chapter is intentionally speculative.

Purpose – This chapter argues that “Partnership Learning to learn” across different disciplinary and professional boundaries is integral to good practice and is necessary in order to promote and to support multidisciplinary practice and education.

Design/Methodology – The chapter draws upon empirical data collected as part of a research project based at Liverpool Hope University (United Kingdom) and previous work undertaken by the authors.

Findings – This chapter explores the models of leadership associated with good or promising collaboration. It suggests that this is likely to include an explicit understanding of the rationale, its role, and purpose; that debate and opposition are encouraged; and that space and time are created to facilitate structured conversations. Finally, a model of engaging with collaborative inquiry needs to be systematically developed.

Research implications – The chapter argues that this model offers insights into how good teacher education and professional development across different settings and disciplines can be promoted. In this chapter, the authors argue that working across boundaries is defined as involving academics, teachers, “experts,” and students.

Practical implications – The chapter suggests that this model of collaborative inquiry and practice has significant implications for how we might model our approach to professional and practitioner education and learning across different professional settings and boundaries.

Originality – The chapter draws upon existing and ongoing development work that has implications for holistic change within organizations.

There is an important intellectual and conceptual challenge for many of us working across the broad field of public sector management. Part of this challenge stems from the observation that there are three connected but separate profound policy and political changes taking place. Firstly, there is the impact of neo-liberalism as an ideological project and as a model(s) of managing national economies and social and welfare policy. We recognise that there are competing definitions of neo-liberalism and that we need to be careful about over-generalising its effect and its coherence. But, it does seem to us that by taking a longer term view we can see how the language and ideas of the primacy of markets and, in particular, markets in social and welfare policy have become dominant. This is not to say that in some places there is no resistance to these ideas and we can observe in the European Union how for a long time there was very explicit resistance to the ideas of the New Right. But the desire to weaken the role of the state as funder and provider of welfare services and the emergence of a counterview that markets and the privatisation of the welfare sector is the most appropriate choice is a demonstration of an ideological shift.

The primary purpose of this paper is to explore the implications of a Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) Report published in June 2008 for the role of voluntary, community and faith (VCF) based organisations in supporting and developing networks of support and influence at the local level.

The paper draws upon the empirical data collected for one of the case studies in the JRF report and develops the conclusions drawn.

The roles played by key individuals in VCF organisations may “open” up access to services for refugee and asylum seekers but they may also inhibit access. Their significance as centres of influence and authority in a post‐representative form of local democracy suggests that their role may have been under‐estimated in the UK. At the same time, local state organisations are experimenting with devolved street based or neighbourhood focussed approaches and these twin developments raise issues of accountability and decision making.

The findings and the paper point to the need for further grounded research which is situated in localities and can examine the ways in which local state agencies have experienced the processes of change and dislocation.

It illustrates a number of examples of innovation at a local level which invite an examination of the replication in other neighbourhoods.

The paper draws upon the direct experience of local community facilitators and explores ways in which they can influence change.